Kant's categorical imperative demands that moral agents never treat persons as mere means, making systemic tolerance of evils that instrumentalize persons impermissible regardless of consequentialist benefits.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
The moral law requiring that one will the maxim of an action as a universal law (removing any self-preference) and treat humanity in any person always as an end and never merely as a means
consequentialist(Shared position of Russell and Moore)
One who believes that the rightness or otherwise of an act is in some way dependent on consequences.