Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Kant's categorical imperative demonstrates that pure practical reason generates the moral law independently of any antecedent desire or inclination.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Humans lack access to pure reason independent of embodied psychology; all reasoning involves prior affective states.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The categorical imperative's formal universalizability test yields indeterminate results on many concrete moral questions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Evolutionary and developmental evidence suggests moral reasoning originates in emotional systems, not pure reason.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral laws must be universal and necessary, not contingent on varying desires, making reason alone their source.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We experience moral obligation as binding even when it conflicts with our inclinations, suggesting non-empirical origin.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Only reason operating independently of desire can ground genuinely autonomous moral agency and free will.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42