Kant's Critique of Judgment explicitly distinguishes aesthetic judgment from teleological judgment, insisting that beauty's purposiveness is felt, not cognized as objective natural order.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
The real, factual way that nature is actually organized and how things actually work in the world, independent of what anyone thinks or feels about it.
Purposiveness(the third quality attributed to Geist in the statement)
The quality of acting with a goal or purpose in mind; doing things intentionally rather than randomly or by accident.
cognized(as used in epistemology (the study of knowledge))
Understood or known by the mind; when you cognize something, you grasp it intellectually rather than just sensing it.
teleological judgment(A topic Kant had never previously linked to aesthetics)
The judgment of both organisms within nature and of nature as a whole, linked by Kant to aesthetic judgment in the third Critique