Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Kant's critique that existence is not a predicate exposes a structural flaw intrinsic to all ontological arguments, not merely contingent versions.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant assumes existence is never a predicate, but quantified logic treats 'there exists an x' as fundamentally different from properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Some ontological arguments (Gödel's) don't treat existence as a predicate but derive necessity from positive properties themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim that existence adds nothing to a concept may conflate grammatical form with logical function in formal systems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Existence is not a property that increases the extension of a concept; perfect island + existence = still just island.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.All ontological arguments treat existence as a predicate by deriving instantiation from conceptual definitions alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant's distinction collapses attempts to move validly from analytic truths about concepts to synthetic truths about reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.