Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kant's exclusion of the agreeable (bodily pleasure) from ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The debate over whether bodily sensations belong to aesthetics proper is more acute in everyday aesthetics than in other aesthetic domains.

    Kant's exclusion of the agreeable (bodily pleasure) from aesthetic judgment applies equally across all aesthetic domains, not uniquely to the everyday.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant defines aesthetic judgment by its disinterestedness; bodily pleasure always involves interest in possession or consumption, making it categorically incompatible with aesthetic appreciation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If agreeable sensations were admitted to aesthetic judgment, no principled boundary would distinguish art from mere appetite satisfaction, collapsing aesthetic categories entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant's distinction between the agreeable and the beautiful reflects a genuine phenomenological difference: we can contemplate a painting's form without desiring to consume it, unlike food.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Some artworks—erotic sculptures, sensual music, culinary compositions—seem to deliberately integrate bodily pleasure into their aesthetic intent without losing aesthetic legitimacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant conflates bodily sensation with interested desire; one can experience tactile or gustatory properties aesthetically (wine tasting, textile appreciation) while remaining disinterested.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The exclusion appears inconsistent: Kant permits aesthetic judgment of color and sound (sensory properties), but arbitrarily forbids aesthetic judgment of taste and touch sensations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    If agreeable sensations were admitted to aesthetic judgment, no principled bound...Kant conflates bodily sensation with interested desire; one can experience tacti...Kant defines aesthetic judgment by its disinterestedness; bodily pleasure always...Kant's distinction between the agreeable and the beautiful reflects a genuine ph...
    +3 moreShow less
    Some artworks—erotic sculptures, sensual music, culinary compositions—seem to de...The debate over whether bodily sensations belong to aesthetics proper is more ac...The exclusion appears inconsistent: Kant permits aesthetic judgment of color and...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit