Kant's Refutation of Idealism shows that inner experience (consciousness of my own existence as determined in time) is only possible through outer experience of persistent spatial objects.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Persistent spatial objects(The external things Kant says we need to be aware of ourselves)
Physical things that exist in space (have location and size) and continue to exist over time, like tables, people, or trees.
Refutation of Idealism(Added to the second edition (B); further developed in a series of Reflections.)
A transcendental argument added by Kant to the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason (B274–279), intended to demonstrate that external spatial objects must exist by deriving that claim from the fact that we have determinate awareness of the temporal order of our representations.
idealism(Presented as a consequence of the coherence theory of truth, but not exclusive to it)