Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kant's position on international relations was inconsistent — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Kant's position on international relations was inconsistent

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The only way to fully overcome the state of nature among states is for states to enter into a federative union with coercive powers
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant did not endorse a federative union with coercive powers
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & Liberty

    Related

    Kant did not endorse a federative union with coercive powersThe only way to fully overcome the state of nature among states is for states to...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Similar

    Mill's own position on offense regulation is not fully consistent.67%Ghate does not explain why Crusoe and Friday could not discuss and def...66%Mill himself identified this difference in moral rights as the fundame...66%Democracy and sovereignty are simultaneously inseparable and in contra...65%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: cosmopolitanism
    View source passageHide passage
    Some critics argued in response that Kant’s position was inconsistent, because on their view, the only way to fully overcome the state of nature among states was for the latter to enter into a federative union with coercive powers. The early Fichte transformed the concept of sovereignty in the process, by conceiving it as layered, and this enabled them to argue that states ought to transfer part of their sovereignty to the federal level, but only that part that concerns their external relations
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit