Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Katz's argument fails to take linguistic pluralism into a... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Katz's argument by elimination for platonism fails

    Katz's argument fails to take linguistic pluralism into account as an alternative ontological position

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    3 linked

    Related

    Devitt's more philosophically grounded nominalism post-dates and undermines Katz...Katz's argument by elimination for platonism failsKatz's trichotomy of nominalism, conceptualism, and platonism is false — it does...

    Similar

    Ramsey's argument that ontological issues can be settled in logico-lin...84%The criticism that Ramsey mistakenly attempted to settle ontological i...82%Lewis's ontological commitment to possible worlds via the argument fro...80%Ontological pluralism is warranted: all entities, whatever their type,...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: linguistics
    View source passageHide passage
    Katz took nominalism to have been refuted by Chomsky in his critiques of American structuralists in the 1960s. But, in Katz’s opinion, Chomsky had failed to notice that conceptualism was infected with many of the same faults as nominalism, because it too localized language spatiotemporally (in contingently existing, finite, human brains). Since contemporary Minimalist theories share in the earlier ontological commitment, Katz’ argument would presumably extent to them. Through an argument by elim

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective