Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Kelly's reflection on peer disagreement shows that treati... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The reply that one is justified in believing a proposition and justified in believing one's evidence supports that proposition may be acceptable in limited cases

    Kelly's reflection on peer disagreement shows that treating one's own assessment as correct presupposes the reliability that higher-order doubt places in question.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Higher-order doubt questions whether our cognitive faculties are reliable, undermining confidence in first-order judgments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Treating one's assessment as correct requires assuming one's reasoning process is trustworthy—a presupposition higher-order doubt challenges.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Peer disagreement reveals that intelligent agents reach opposite conclusions, suggesting individual confidence lacks adequate justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.We can justifiably rely on first-order judgments without resolving all higher-order doubts about reliability—pragmatic reasoning often requires this.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Peer disagreement shows disagreement exists, not that any particular peer's confidence is unjustified or presupposes false reliability claims.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rejecting one's own assessment as correct requires the same reliability assumptions it questions, creating symmetric self-defeat for skeptics.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Higher-order doubt questions whether our cognitive faculties are reliable, under...Peer disagreement reveals that intelligent agents reach opposite conclusions, su...Peer disagreement shows disagreement exists, not that any particular peer's conf...Rejecting one's own assessment as correct requires the same reliability assumpti...
    +3 moreShow less
    The reply that one is justified in believing a proposition and justified in beli...Treating one's assessment as correct requires assuming one's reasoning process i...We can justifiably rely on first-order judgments without resolving all higher-or...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit