Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kilwardby describes the process of perception as a being-... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Kilwardby's theory of sense perception is Aristotelian in one respect

    Kilwardby describes the process of perception as a being-affected

    Perception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Perception

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Kilwardby accepts that our knowledge of the world originates in sense experience

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Kilwardby's theory of sense perception is Aristotelian in one respect

    Similar

    To feel is a kind of being-affected82%Principle 1 defines perception in terms of production by sensory conne...82%Ordinary perception typically requires the perceived thing to be an ob...81%We perceive various actual events and processes by means of sensation80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: robert-kilwardby
    View source passageHide passage
    Kilwardby’s theory of sense perception is, on the one hand, Aristotelian because he accepts that our knowledge of the world originates in sense experience; he describes the process of perception as a being-affected. On the other hand, it is Augustinian because he limits the efficient role of the object to the affection of the sense organs; he takes the soul to be the true efficient cause of perception, reacting to the body’s being affected and making in and from itself the images of exterior obj

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective