Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Knowledge of an object is only achieved when that object is related to still other objects.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Direct acquaintance with particulars (e.g., qualia, sense-data) yields knowledge prior to and independent of any relational context.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Russell's distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description shows that some knowledge is non-relational and immediate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Husserl's phenomenological analysis demonstrates that intentional consciousness can grasp an object's essential structure through eidetic intuition without recourse to external relata.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If relational knowledge presupposes grasping the relata themselves, then at least some foundational knowledge of objects must be non-relational to avoid an infinite regress.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Knowledge consists in the relation of one thing to some other thing
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Objects stand in myriad spatio-temporal relations to other objects
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.