Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Knowledge requires a truth-maker that is settled and determinate at the time of belief formation.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some truths (future contingents, quantum events) lack determinate truth-makers even when knowable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Knowledge of historical events relies on evidence from past, not determinate present truth-makers.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The requirement conflates epistemology (how we know) with metaphysics (what makes things true).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Belief formed on unstable or indeterminate grounds cannot constitute knowledge, only lucky guessing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Truth-makers must exist independently of our beliefs for those beliefs to track objective reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Determinate truth-makers at belief-time prevent skeptical scenarios where justification misleads us.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.