Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kohlberg (1969) and Piaget (1970) argued children are not... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The analogy between language acquisition and moral acquisition is weakened because children may not display moral competence until age 8–12, by which time they have received substantial moral instruction.

    Kohlberg (1969) and Piaget (1970) argued children are not fully competent with moral judgment until age 8–12.

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language

    Related

    By age 8–12, children have received considerable moral instruction, both implici...If moral competence develops only after extensive instruction, positing innate m...The analogy between language acquisition and moral acquisition is weakened becau...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    By age 8–12, children have received considerable moral instruction, bo...83%The analogy between language acquisition and moral acquisition is weak...82%In the moral case, a child need not understand moral rules in order to...78%Even young children after a certain age intuitively distinguish conven...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: experimental-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    L1/M1 refer to Chomsky’s poverty of the stimulus argument: despite receiving little explicit linguistic and grammatical instruction, children develop language rapidly and at a young age, and quickly come to display competence applying complex grammatical rules. Similarly, Mikhail and other proponents of the analogy argue that children acquire moral knowledge at a young age based on relatively little explicit instruction. However, critics of the analogy point out several points of difference. Fir

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective