Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    KQML invalidates BF, CBF, and BoxN by restricting quantif... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The invalidity of BF, CBF, and BoxN in KQML results from a superficial semantic adjustment rather than a substantive metaphysical change

    KQML invalidates BF, CBF, and BoxN by restricting quantifiers to the domain of individuals actual at each world

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Related

    Formal adjustments to quantifier evaluation do not change what entities the inte...The invalidity of BF, CBF, and BoxN in KQML results from a superficial semantic ...The underlying domain of the interpretation still contains merely possible indiv...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    This restriction is a formal modification of the semantic apparatus for evaluati...

    Similar

    KQML modifies how quantified formulas are evaluated at worlds by restr...82%The validity of BF in SQML (Standard Quantified Modal Logic) depends e...81%The Aristotelian quantifier 'Some' validates removing restrictions fro...80%N is invalid in KQML because world domains can vary across possible wo...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: possibilism-actualism
    View source passageHide passage
    On the face of it, KQML provides the actualist with a powerful alternative to SQML. However, one might well question its actualist credentials. Specifically, despite the invalidity of the actualistically objectionable principles BF, CBF, and \(\Box\textbf{N},\) it is questionable whether KQML has escaped ontological commitment to possibilia, for the following reason. KQML provides us with a formal semantics for (constant-free) modal languages \(\scrL_\Box\) and, in particular, an account of how

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective