Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kreisel and Sacks showed that relativized computability c... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→K is Turing complete among the computably enumerable sets

    Kreisel and Sacks showed that relativized computability contexts admit c.e. sets whose Turing degree structure diverges from the unrelativized case, undermining the generality of K's completeness claim.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    C.e. sets(as a category of mathematical objects)
    Short for 'computably enumerable sets'—collections of numbers or objects that a computer could theoretically list out, even if it might take forever to list them all.
    K's completeness claim(as a fundamental claim about logical systems)
    A statement (likely by Kurt Gödel, denoted as 'K') arguing that a certain logical system is 'complete'—meaning it can prove everything that's true within its rules.
    Kreisel and Sacks(as cited researchers in computability theory)
    Georg Kreisel and Gerald Sacks were 20th-century mathematicians and logicians who studied the limits and structure of what computers can and cannot compute.
    Relativized computability(as a modified framework for computation)
    A way of studying what can be computed when you're allowed to use certain extra tools or information as shortcuts, rather than starting from scratch.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Turing degree(as a measure of computational difficulty)
    A way of measuring how 'hard' a problem is to solve—two problems have the same Turing degree if they're equally difficult from a computational standpoint.
    Unrelativized case(as the baseline framework)
    The standard, basic situation where no extra tools or shortcuts are allowed—just the pure, fundamental rules of what computation can do.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Proof of definition segments1 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    K is Turing complete among the computably enumerable sets

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective