Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Kripke's framework allows ostensive definition to fix the reference of a name even when the named item resists descriptive characterization.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Ostensive definition requires interpretive uptake—a hearer must grasp which property or object the pointing targets, requiring some description.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Complete descriptive resistance creates indeterminacy: without criteria distinguishing target from lookalikes, reference becomes insecure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kripke's causal-historical theory still presupposes an initial descriptive fixing to anchor the causal chain's origin point.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Ostensive definition (pointing) can establish reference without descriptive content, as shown by naming infants or novel objects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Many natural kinds resist complete descriptive characterization yet have determinate reference via historical causal chains.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kripke's rigid designation allows names to refer across counterfactuals despite uncertainty about the named entity's properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.