Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Krug's accusation against Schelling's idealist philosophy of nature is misguided.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Krug conflated the understanding with reason.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Krug treated the Absolute as something on the same level as finite things.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Schelling's Naturphilosophie operates at the level of speculative reason, not the finite categories of the understanding that Krug employs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Krug's demand that idealism deduce his pen presupposes that philosophical reason must account for contingent empirical particulars, which conflates epistemic levels.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel explicitly argues in the 'Relationship of Naturphilosophie to Philosophy in General' that contingent finite objects fall outside the scope of speculative derivation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Treating the Absolute as a finite object among others commits what Hegel calls the error of 'reflective philosophy,' which mistakes relational categories for unconditioned ground.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's own critical philosophy establishes that the unconditioned cannot be an object of determinate cognition, making Krug's demand for empirical deduction self-undermining on Kantian terms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.