Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Kvanvig's epistemic indexical reading entails that 'unknown' picks out different propositions relative to different epistemic communities or times.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Facts about objective reality don't change when epistemic communities change their knowledge; propositions track facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If 'unknown' is indexical, we couldn't meaningfully compare past and present ignorance across epistemic shifts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Indexicality applies to reference frames (speaker, time, place), not to semantic properties of predicates themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Epistemic states vary across communities, so what counts as 'unknown' depends on collective knowledge standards.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Scientific 'unknowns' differ between 1900 and 2024, suggesting temporal relativity of the unknown predicate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Indexicals like 'I' and 'here' are context-sensitive; epistemic terms should follow similar patterns.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.