Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Latin trinitarians like Augustine hold that the divine persons are distinguished by relations of origin, not by being numerically distinct substances.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If persons share one substance but are really distinct, relationalism must explain how relations alone ground real metaphysical difference, not mere conceptual distinction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Appealing to relations of origin risks making the Trinity a logical construct rather than addressing whether three genuine subjects of consciousness exist.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Augustine's framework struggles to explain biblical passages suggesting the persons have distinct wills or knowledge without implying substance plurality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If persons were numerically distinct substances, there would be three gods, violating monotheism that Augustine explicitly defends.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Relations of origin (Father generates Son, Spirit proceeds) are real properties that genuinely differentiate without requiring substance multiplication.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Augustine's account preserves biblical language about Father, Son, Spirit while avoiding modalism by grounding distinctions in relational structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.