Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Le Grand holds that the Divine Will and Intellect are one. — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Le Grand's position on body-body causation amounts to occasionalism.

    Le Grand holds that the Divine Will and Intellect are one.

    Divine AttributesTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation3 linkedPhilosophy of Language

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    Le Grand holds that conservation and creation are the same such that God creates...Le Grand holds that motion is identical to the will of God.Le Grand holds that there are no accidents.Le Grand's position on body-body causation amounts to occasionalism.

    Similar

    The Supreme Good is the Supreme Being.87%FACTORIZATION is in both NP and coNP.86%BQP contains both P and BPP84%Ideas are really identical with the Divine Nature.83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legrand
    View source passageHide passage
    Le Grand’s contribution to the Cartesian account of motion may either be seen as an extension or a revision of Descartes’s, sometimes ambiguous, treatment. Le Grand took seriously the claim that God is the total and efficient cause of motion in the universe, and that matter is entirely passive, and hence bodies are incapable of self-movement, or of moving other bodies. In his Entire Body of Philosophy, he argued that since a body may be in motion or at rest, motion must be a mode non-essential t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective