Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Legal and religious judgments of blame can be made about ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Moral judgments of blame cannot be made about persons who are legitimately ignorant of what morality requires of them.

    Legal and religious judgments of blame can be made about persons who are legitimately ignorant, but moral judgments differ in this respect.

    Justice & PunishmentMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityJustice & Punishment

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Virtue Ethics
    1 linked

    Related

    Moral judgments of blame cannot be made about persons who are legitimately ignor...Morality is a public system: a system of norms knowable by all those to whom it ...Morality is not irrational for any of those to whom it applies to follow.

    Similar

    Moral judgments of blame cannot be made about persons who are legitima...89%Even those who are fully impaired for moral understanding are open to ...81%Lack of knowledge is a morally relevant factor for assigning blame.81%Appropriate blame rests on a justified judgment of wrongdoing79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: morality-definition
    View source passageHide passage
    In contrast to natural law theories, other moral theories do not hold quite so strong a view about the universality of knowledge of morality. Still, many hold that morality is known to all who can legitimately be judged by it. Baier (1958), Rawls (1971) and contractarians deny that there can be an esoteric morality: one that judges people even though they cannot know what it prohibits, requires, etc. For all of the above theorists, morality is what we can call a public system: a system of norms

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective