Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Legitimate authority at the level of the nation state is necessary to pursue moral cosmopolitan goals
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Transnational institutions like the EU, ICC, and WTO already pursue and partially achieve cosmopolitan goals without nation-state legitimacy as their foundation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If cosmopolitan goals are achievable through overlapping jurisdictions and non-state actors, nation-state legitimacy is sufficient but not necessary for their realization.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Pogge and Beitz argue that global justice requires reforming the international order itself, which nation-state legitimacy actively reproduces and entrenches.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
When nation-state legitimate authority structurally generates global inequality through border regimes and resource privilege, it is an obstacle to cosmopolitan goals, not their precondition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Political nationalism is assumed as the operative framework
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Empirical conditions require nation-state legitimacy for cosmopolitan goals to be realizable
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.