Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Legitimizing plausibility assessments erodes the boundary... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Plausibility assessments play an important, legitimate role in the sciences

    Legitimizing plausibility assessments erodes the boundary between scientific reasoning and mere subjective preference for elegance or simplicity.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Plausibility assessments rely on subjective judgments about elegance and simplicity rather than empirical evidence or logical necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Once plausibility becomes a legitimized criterion, scientists can rationalize preferring theories based on aesthetic appeal rather than predictive power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Science's epistemic authority depends on distinguishing rigorous empirical methods from the subjective taste-based reasoning of philosophy or art.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Plausibility assessments track objective features like internal consistency and compatibility with background knowledge, not mere subjective preference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Scientists have always legitimately used plausibility reasoning—parsimony, coherence—to guide theory selection without collapsing into subjectivity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The boundary between science and preference is maintained by empirical testing and peer scrutiny of plausibility claims, not by excluding them entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Once plausibility becomes a legitimized criterion, scientists can rationalize pr...Plausibility assessments play an important, legitimate role in the sciencesPlausibility assessments rely on subjective judgments about elegance and simplic...Plausibility assessments track objective features like internal consistency and ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Science's epistemic authority depends on distinguishing rigorous empirical metho...Scientists have always legitimately used plausibility reasoning—parsimony, coher...The boundary between science and preference is maintained by empirical testing a...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit