Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Leibniz argued that God's sufficiency as a complete expla... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There may be more than one God involved in the creation of the universe

    Leibniz argued that God's sufficiency as a complete explanatory ground renders competing co-creators redundant within any adequate cosmological account.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.An omnipotent being requires no assistance; invoking additional creators contradicts logical parsimony and divine perfection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason demands a single ultimate ground; multiple co-creators generate infinite regress problems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.God's complete knowledge and power entails complete causal responsibility; co-creators would dilute God's explanatory adequacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Reality exhibits genuine causal plurality (human free will, natural laws); monistic explanation may sacrifice empirical adequacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz conflates logical sufficiency with causal exclusivity; God could be adequate without being the sole active agent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim assumes 'complete explanatory ground' is coherent; it may merely relocate rather than resolve fundamental metaphysical puzzles.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Against an aspect of God1 linkedNatural Theology1 linked

    Related

    An omnipotent being requires no assistance; invoking additional creators contrad...God's complete knowledge and power entails complete causal responsibility; co-cr...Leibniz conflates logical sufficiency with causal exclusivity; God could be adeq...Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason demands a single ultimate ground; multi...
    +3 moreShow less
    Reality exhibits genuine causal plurality (human free will, natural laws); monis...The claim assumes 'complete explanatory ground' is coherent; it may merely reloc...There may be more than one God involved in the creation of the universe

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit