Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Leibniz himself denied that infinitesimals had any fixed ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→To do full justice to both Leibniz's and Nieuwentijdt's conceptions of infinitesimals, two distinct sorts of infinitesimals are required.

    Leibniz himself denied that infinitesimals had any fixed ontological status, treating them as useful fictions governed by the law of continuity rather than as genuine magnitudes of a specific kind.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Leibniz's extensive use of infinitesimals in calculus while denying their reality suggests he viewed them pragmatically as computational tools.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The law of continuity allows infinitesimals to produce correct results without requiring commitment to their actual existence as magnitudes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Treating infinitesimals as fictions avoids metaphysical problems about infinite divisibility that plagued contemporary mathematics.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Leibniz's monadic metaphysics suggests he may have endorsed infinitesimals as real features of his actual infinite metaphysical structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.His private correspondence reveals commitments to infinitesimal reality that contradict the 'useful fiction' interpretation of published work.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If infinitesimals are mere fictions, the law of continuity cannot explain why they yield empirically accurate physical predictions reliably.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Genuine magnitudes(as what Leibniz said infinitesimals were NOT)
    Real, actual sizes or quantities that truly exist as mathematical objects in their own right.
    Law of continuity(as the rule Leibniz said infinitesimals follow)
    A principle suggesting that nature doesn't make sudden jumps—instead, changes happen smoothly and gradually, without gaps.
    Leibniz
    Leibniz is a German philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s-1700s who developed calculus (a powerful math tool for measuring change and areas) independently around the same time as Isaac Newton. He's famous for creating much of the notation we still use in mathematics today and for arguing that everything in the universe follows logical principles. His ideas profoundly influenced modern science, mathematics, and philosophy, making him one of history's most important thinkers.
    Ontological status(in metaphysics (the study of what exists))
    What kind of thing something is considered to be or how real it exists—for example, whether something is a physical object, a concept, a property, or something else entirely.
    Useful fictions(what Field claims mathematical statements are)
    Things we treat as true and useful for practical purposes, even though we don't think they actually exist in reality—like how we might use a fictional character's perspective to understand human nature.
    infinitesimals(Peirce's philosophy of mathematics and foundations of calculus)
    Quantities that constitute the 'glue' causing points on a continuous line to lose their individual identity, thereby grounding the concept of a true continuum

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    His private correspondence reveals commitments to infinitesimal reality that con...If infinitesimals are mere fictions, the law of continuity cannot explain why th...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Leibniz's extensive use of infinitesimals in calculus while denying their realit...
    Leibniz's monadic metaphysics suggests he may have endorsed infinitesimals as re...
    +3 moreShow less
    The law of continuity allows infinitesimals to produce correct results without r...To do full justice to both Leibniz's and Nieuwentijdt's conceptions of infinites...Treating infinitesimals as fictions avoids metaphysical problems about infinite ...