Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Lessing fails to make this essential distinction. — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Painting and sculpture are essentially distinct art forms and must be distinguished as such.

    Lessing fails to make this essential distinction.

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Connections

    3 topics

    Perception3 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Painting and sculpture are essentially distinct art forms and must be distinguis...Painting corresponds to sight and sculpture corresponds to touch.Sight is a sense for mere appearance, not reality.Touch is the sense for reality.

    Similar

    Beardsley's argument fails because its two halves merge into one, unde...78%Moritz draws no distinction between Wolff's and Baumgarten's conceptio...77%Art is best understood as one of these essentially contested concepts74%Lessing fails to mention this point in the case of poetry74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-german
    View source passageHide passage
    The main thrust of the fourth Grove, building upon Herder’s insistence that aesthetics must employ the methods of both Aristotle and Kames in order to reach Baumgartian conclusions, is that recognition of the distinctions among our senses will explain the variety of both forms of art and forms of aesthetic response. The premise of Herder’s argument is that aesthetic response is not the disinterested reaction of a special internal sense to purely formal properties of objects, but is really the he

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective