Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Lewis's 'can' is indexical to a set of facts: the traveler CAN kill relative to their abilities, skills, and proximity to the target.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If 'can' is fully indexical to local facts, distant obstacles shouldn't affect possibility; yet they intuitively do matter for truth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Indexicality conflates epistemic limitations (what we know about abilities) with metaphysical facts (what's genuinely possible).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Lewis's view risks making 'can' subjective or pragmatic rather than objective, undermining its use in logic, law, and moral responsibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Modal claims like 'can' vary by context: 'I can speak French' means different things to a native vs. learner, supporting indexicality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Ability-based 'can' must be sensitive to actual capacities; indexing to skills/proximity makes 'can' statements empirically verifiable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Lewis's framework explains why the same action is possible for one agent but not another in identical logical/metaphysical circumstances.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.