Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Liberal societies may justifiably restrict offensive behavior when the offense is hard to avoid, offenders' expressive interests are modest, and offenders have alternative avenues of expression.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Most liberal societies do in fact allow for some nuisance regulation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If profound nuisance prevention is to be allowed, some balancing test must be employed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Restriction is only warranted when the offense is hard to avoid, expressive interests of offenders are modest, and alternative avenues of expression exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.