Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Light itself is incipient meaning, suspending the opposit... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Light itself is incipient meaning, suspending the opposition between the a priori and the a posteriori

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Heidegger began a hermeneutic deformalizing of Husserl's phenomenological consciousness by seeking what lies hidden beneath phenomena
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Levinas extended this deformalizing gesture in 1947 by arguing that meaning is embedded in perceptual experience itself
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant demonstrated that the a priori/a posteriori distinction is logically prior to any phenomenological account of perceptual experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A phenomenological description of how light 'feels' meaningful cannot dissolve a transcendental distinction without first engaging its epistemic justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Sellars' critique of the Myth of the Given shows that treating perceptual immediacy as intrinsically meaningful conflates causal and normative orders.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If light carries incipient meaning pre-reflectively, Levinas must explain how this meaning is normatively binding without invoking the conceptual apparatus he claims to suspend.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    AestheticsPerception

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind2 linked

    Related

    A phenomenological description of how light 'feels' meaningful cannot dissolve a...Heidegger began a hermeneutic deformalizing of Husserl's phenomenological consci...If light carries incipient meaning pre-reflectively, Levinas must explain how th...Kant demonstrated that the a priori/a posteriori distinction is logically prior ...
    +2 moreShow less
    Levinas extended this deformalizing gesture in 1947 by arguing that meaning is e...Sellars' critique of the Myth of the Given shows that treating perceptual immedi...

    Similar

    Space is an epistemic condition specific to our kind of discursive cog...70%Nowhere is an external object grasped as a unity or whole apart from i...69%The concept of something that exists but is unperceived is a contradic...69%Therefore, the supposition of an unconceived existent is self-undermin...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: levinas
    View source passageHide passage
    In the fourteen years separating Existence and Existents and Time and the Other from Totality and Infinity, we see both continuities and differences. If Heidegger had begun what he conceived to be a hermeneutic deformalization of Husserl’s phenomenological consciousness, seeking what “lies hidden” beneath phenomena (he-BT: §7c), then Levinas extended this deformalizing gesture already in 1947, arguing that light itself is incipient meaning, suspending the opposition between the a priori and the
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit