Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Linguistic theory entails that many sentences that have n... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Linguistic theory must be interpreted as being about sentence types, which are abstract objects, rather than sentence tokens

    Linguistic theory entails that many sentences that have never been tokened (internally or externally) are well-formed English sentences

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linkedModality & Possibility2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    If we want to claim that our linguistic theories are true, we must accept the co...Linguistic theory must be interpreted as being about sentence types, which are a...Therefore the theorems must be true of something other than tokens — namely, sen...These theorems cannot be true of sentence tokens because the sentences in questi...

    Similar

    Linguistic theory has true theorems about sentences that have never be...90%Linguistic theory has true theorems about sentences that have never be...89%Statements attributing properties to such sentences (e.g., being well-...83%Linguistic theory must be interpreted as being about sentence types, w...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: platonism
    View source passageHide passage
    The quoted sentences that appear in (A) and (B) are singular terms; e.g., “‘The cat is on the mat’” refers to the sentence ‘The cat is on the mat’, and (A) says of this sentence that it has a certain property, namely, that of being a well-formed English sentence. Thus, if sentences like (A) are true — and it certainly seems that they are — then they commit us to believing in the existence of sentences. Now, one might hold a physicalistic view here according to which linguistics is about actual (

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective