Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Living, embodied organisms are the proper subjects of sen... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Sensation belongs to the organic body, not to the mind.

    Living, embodied organisms are the proper subjects of sensation.

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    Sensation belongs to the organic body, not to the mind.Sensation is purely passive.The mind is purely active and therefore cannot be the seat of sensation.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The human (embodied) mind has the faculty or capacity to have sensory ...82%Human beings are embodied beings whose agency depends on use and contr...79%Individual human beings are organisms and thus matter78%Bodily sensations do not have an intentional object in the way percept...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: continental-rationalism
    View source passageHide passage
    Another line of discussion that relates to the problem of dualism and the nature of ideas is advanced in 1734 by Ghanaian philosopher Anton Amo. An extraordinarily interesting thinker in his own right, Amo advances a critique of Descartes’s assertion that the mind can sense, that is, that the immaterial mind can passively receive sensory information. In his dissertation, On the Apatheia of the Human Mind, or The Absence of Sensation and the Faculty of Sense in the Human Mind and Their Presence i

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective