Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Locke's view that coercive power is merely a secondary fe... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Locke's view that coercive power is merely a secondary feature of the civil state is mistaken.

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.For Locke and his contemporary followers, coercive power is secondary — needed only to back up laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.For Kant, coercion is part of the idea of rights itself, not a supplementary enforcement mechanism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If coercion is constitutive of rights, it cannot be secondary to the civil state.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    For Kant, coercion is part of the idea of rights itself, not a supplementary enf...For Locke and his contemporary followers, coercive power is secondary — needed o...If coercion is constitutive of rights, it cannot be secondary to the civil state...

    Similar

    If coercion is constitutive of rights, it cannot be secondary to the c...87%Legitimacy of the civil state must therefore account for the coercive ...85%For Kant, coercion is part of the idea of rights itself, not a supplem...82%For Locke and his contemporary followers, coercive power is secondary ...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: legitimacy
    View source passageHide passage
    The civil state, according to Kant, establishes the rights necessary to secure equal freedom. Unlike for Locke and his contemporary followers, however, coercive power is not a secondary feature of the civil state, necessary to back up laws. According to Kant, coercion is part of the idea of rights. The thought can be explained as follows. Coercion is defined as a restriction of the freedom to pursue one’s own ends. Any right of a person—independently of whether it is respected or has been violat
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit