Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Logical positivism's proscription of metaphysics as meani... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Logical Positivism fails as a philosophical method.

    Logical positivism's proscription of metaphysics as meaningless nonsense illegitimately forecloses inquiry into presuppositions that scientific practice itself depends upon, as Stebbing's directional analysis reveals.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Directional analysis(The analytical approach Stebbing used to challenge logical positivism)
    Stebbing's method of carefully examining how words and concepts point toward or refer to things in reality, used to show that meaningful thinking goes beyond just scientific statements.
    Forecloses inquiry(Logical positivism's rejection of metaphysics prevents people from exploring deeper questions)
    Shuts down or prevents further investigation and questioning on a topic.
    Proscription(Logical positivism's proscription means it banned or rejected metaphysics)
    An official ban or prohibition on something.
    Stebbing, L. Susan(The philosopher whose work is mentioned as revealing the problem with logical positivism)
    A British philosopher (1885–1943) who criticized logical positivism for being too narrow and showed that science actually relies on assumptions that positivism rejected as meaningless.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    logical positivism(Wiener Kreis, first half of the twentieth century)
    A philosophical program aiming to reconstruct scientific knowledge solely on the basis of direct observations and logical relations between observational statements.
    metaphysics(Hartshorne's naturalistic redefinition of metaphysics)
    On Hartshorne's view, the study not of realities beyond the physical, but of features of reality that are ubiquitous or that would exist in any possible world.
    presuppositions(Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics)
    The foundational assumptions or commitments that govern thought within a given domain of inquiry, which Collingwood later identified as the proper subject matter of philosophical (metaphysical) investigation.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Logical Positivism fails as a philosophical method.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective