Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Luck egalitarianism is mistaken in its aim because egalit... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Luck egalitarianism is mistaken in its aim because egalitarian justice should seek solidarity and respect among citizens, not equal distribution of goods.

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Elizabeth Anderson's relational egalitarianism shows that luck egalitarianism's obsessive focus on distribution abandons victims of bad option luck, violating equal standing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A just society requires citizens to relate as equals in social institutions, a condition no distributive formula alone can establish or maintain.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.When egalitarianism targets brute luck rather than oppressive social hierarchies, it misidentifies the actual injustice that political equality is designed to remedy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Rawls's original position grounds justice in fair terms of cooperation among equals, not in neutralizing natural contingencies through redistribution.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Samuel Scheffler's work demonstrates that egalitarian concern originates in relational duties of mutual respect, which distributive metrics systematically fail to capture.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Luck egalitarianism's intrusive inquiries into personal choices to determine compensation eligibility treat citizens as subjects of pity rather than as free and equal persons.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Luck egalitarians hold that the goal of egalitarian justice is achieving an equal distribution of goods.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The proper aim of egalitarian justice is egalitarian solidarity and respect among members of society, not distribution of goods.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    A just society requires citizens to relate as equals in social institutions, a c...Elizabeth Anderson's relational egalitarianism shows that luck egalitarianism's ...Luck egalitarianism's intrusive inquiries into personal choices to determine com...Luck egalitarians hold that the goal of egalitarian justice is achieving an equa...
    +4 moreShow less
    Rawls's original position grounds justice in fair terms of cooperation among equ...Samuel Scheffler's work demonstrates that egalitarian concern originates in rela...The proper aim of egalitarian justice is egalitarian solidarity and respect amon...When egalitarianism targets brute luck rather than oppressive social hierarchies...

    Similar

    The proper aim of egalitarian justice is egalitarian solidarity and re...92%Luck egalitarians hold that the goal of egalitarian justice is achievi...89%If egalitarianism is extended globally, it is Quixotic and utopian bec...80%Luck egalitarianism is objectionable because it requires distributive ...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: egalitarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    The ideal of a just modern society as a democratic society in which citizens relate as equals appears in writings by Michael Walzer on social justice (Walzer, 1983). Elizabeth Anderson and Samuel Scheffler both affirm versions of relational equality and from this standpoint criticize the family of views that Anderson calls “luck egalitarian,” whose foremost exponents are perhaps G. A. Cohen and Ronald Dworkin (Cohen 1989, Anderson 1999, Scheffler 2010, chapters 7 and 8, Dworkin 2000, and for res
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit