Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Many examples of fine-tuning do not allow for the complexity required for life.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The inference from 'no stars' to 'no life' presupposes carbon-based life is the only possible substrate for living systems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Physicists like Victor Stenger have argued that alternative life-permitting chemistries may exist under radically different physical constants.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without surveying the full space of possible life-forms, the fine-tuning argument commits a failure of imagination masquerading as empirical necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics and inflationary multiverse cosmology suggest our universe is one of vastly many realized physical configurations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If sufficiently many universes exist with varying constants, the anthropic principle entails that observers will necessarily find themselves in life-permitting ones, requiring no further teleological explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This move, endorsed by physicists like Steven Weinberg and philosophers like David Lewis via modal realism, naturalizes apparent fine-tuning without invoking design.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If there were no stars, there would be no stable sources of energy and no mechanism for producing the heavier elements in the periodic table.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A universe without stars would lack the chemical building blocks needed for a living entity to extract energy from the environment and thereby resist the pull of entropy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.