Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Many exponential-time algorithms (e.g., simplex method) p... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Practical computability correlates with the existence of polynomial time algorithms.

    Many exponential-time algorithms (e.g., simplex method) perform efficiently in practice, while some polynomial algorithms (e.g., ellipsoid method) are practically useless.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Average-case performance on real problem instances matters more than worst-case theoretical bounds for practical utility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Simplex exploits problem structure and sparsity patterns common in practice, while ellipsoid method's advantages only appear theoretically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Implementation efficiency, cache locality, and numerical stability are often more important than algorithmic complexity class.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Modern implementations of polynomial methods (interior-point algorithms) outperform simplex on many large-scale problems in practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Ellipsoid method's theoretical significance doesn't require practical efficiency—it proved P-membership for linear programming.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Simplex's exponential worst-case exists; practitioners avoid it by using hybrid methods or careful problem formulation, not dismissing theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Average-case performance on real problem instances matters more than worst-case ...Ellipsoid method's theoretical significance doesn't require practical efficiency...Implementation efficiency, cache locality, and numerical stability are often mor...Modern implementations of polynomial methods (interior-point algorithms) outperf...
    +3 moreShow less
    Practical computability correlates with the existence of polynomial time algorit...Simplex exploits problem structure and sparsity patterns common in practice, whi...Simplex's exponential worst-case exists; practitioners avoid it by using hybrid ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit