Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Many forms of moral naturalism allow compatibility betwee... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The debunking evolutionary argument from parsimony, clarity, and non-circularity is not a threat to moral naturalism.

    Many forms of moral naturalism allow compatibility between moral truth and Darwinian moral evolution.

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral naturalism does not presuppose properties of a special or non-natural kind...Moral naturalism opens the possibility that ancestors who responded positively t...The debunking argument assumes moral beliefs are not about moral properties that...The debunking evolutionary argument from parsimony, clarity, and non-circularity...
    +2 moreShow less
    The problem that moral truths would be both normative and natural is not a new p...There is no special epistemic problem of circularity for moral naturalism beyond...

    Similar

    Moral naturalism, in all its forms, identifies moral properties with n...83%Embracing moral naturalism requires abandoning the view that moral tru...82%Current moral naturalism proposes that moral-natural identities are di...81%Moral naturalism grounds moral facts entirely in the natural world and...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    An immediate difficulty with this debunking argument is that it assumes that moral beliefs are not about moral properties that are also natural properties and hence are empirically knowable and can interact causally with other natural properties (compare Sturgeon’s reply to Harman in Sturgeon 1985; see also Campbell 1996, on Ruse). Consideration of moral naturalism, that is, opens up the possibility that those of our ancestors who tended to respond positively to moral properties had an advantage

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective