Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Many philosophers believe something can be non-instrument... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The term 'intrinsic' should sometimes be reserved for what is good in virtue of its intrinsic properties, with non-instrumental value instead called 'telic' or 'final'.

    Many philosophers believe something can be non-instrumentally good in virtue of its relation to something else.

    Truth & KnowledgeVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If non-instrumental goodness can depend on relations, then 'intrinsic' (implying...The term 'intrinsic' should sometimes be reserved for what is good in virtue of ...

    Similar

    Whatever is non-instrumentally good must be good in virtue of its intr...84%If something is good only because it is related to something else, the...84%If the relation is what is non-instrumentally good, then the thing its...79%Although moral opinions are not genuinely true or false (being optativ...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: value-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    Philosophers’ adoption of the term “intrinsic” for this distinction reflects a common theory, according to which whatever is non-instrumentally good must be good in virtue of its intrinsic properties. This idea is supported by a natural argument: if something is good only because it is related to something else, the argument goes, then it must be its relation to the other thing that is non-instrumentally good, and the thing itself is good only because it is needed in order to obtain this relatio

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective