Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Many theories of justice are not committed to a narrow pe... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Current generations do have duties of climate justice to future people, even given the Non-Identity Problem

    Many theories of justice are not committed to a narrow person-affecting point of view

    ConsequentialismJustice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Environmental Ethics2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Current generations do have duties of climate justice to future people, even giv...Sufficientarian, egalitarian, prioritarian, and other accounts of justice do not...The Non-Identity Problem only undermines duties to future people if justice requ...

    Similar

    Utilitarian theory need not mirror common intuitions about justice exa...82%Retributive justice is an appealing theory of punishment.79%Utilitarian theory can systematize our understanding of justice withou...78%Contractarian theories of justice risk excluding the severely disabled...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: justice-climate
    View source passageHide passage
    This is not the place to discuss the Non Identity Problem in depth (see entry on nonidentity problem). It is, however, perhaps worth noting that many are not persuaded that this argument shows that current generations lack duties of (climate) justice to future people. The nub of the issue is whether theories of justice are committed to a “narrow person-affecting” point of view (Parfit 1984: 393–395). Broome appears to assume that they are. However, many others maintain that justice to future g

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective