Margaret Walker and Charles Griswold both acknowledge that imposing normative scripts on victims risks re-subordinating them to external demands about how to manage their own moral responses.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Charles Griswold(as the philosopher being cited in this statement): A contemporary American philosopher who studies ethics, particularly focusing on forgiveness, resentment, and how we repair relationships after wrongdoing.
Margaret Walker(as a philosopher cited for ideas about victims and moral recovery): A contemporary philosopher who writes about ethics, forgiveness, and how people process harm and wrongdoing.
Moral responses(as in what victims should be free to choose for themselves): The ways people feel, think, and act based on their sense of right and wrong—their personal ethical reactions.
Re-subordinating(describing how imposing rules can harm victims who are already vulnerable): Putting someone back into a position of being controlled or having less power than someone else, usually after they've already experienced that.

Based on where you are in your exploration