Marr's tri-level hypothesis establishes that computational-level descriptions (what is computed) are explanatorily independent of implementational-level facts (how long physical execution takes).

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Computational-level description(the first level of Marr's hypothesis): An explanation of what a brain or computer is trying to figure out or accomplish, without worrying about how it actually does it physically.
Explanatorily independent(describing the relationship between what a system computes and how physically fast it runs): Means you can fully explain one thing without needing to know about another thing; they're separate in terms of understanding.
Implementational-level facts(the practical, physical level of how systems operate): The physical details of how something actually works in practice—like how fast a computer's circuits run or how long it takes neurons to fire.
Marr, David(the originator of the tri-level analysis framework mentioned): A cognitive scientist who created an influential framework for understanding how the brain processes information by breaking it down into three levels of analysis.

Based on where you are in your exploration