Martha Nussbaum in 'The Fragility of Goodness' explicitly treats Diotima's account as a general theory of eros that pathologizes all particular attachment, not merely a guide for the initiated.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Diotima(the philosophical theory being discussed): A character in Plato's dialogue 'Symposium' who teaches Socrates about love; she describes a spiritual journey of ascending from loving one person to loving beauty itself.
Martha Nussbaum(as the main thinker referenced in the statement): A contemporary American philosopher known for writing about emotions, ethics, and how societies should be organized; she argues that certain emotions like anger can actually harm our justice systems.
Pathologizes(medical/social criticism): Treating something normal or neutral as if it were a disease or mental disorder that needs to be fixed.
The Fragility of Goodness(the specific work referenced): A famous book by Nussbaum arguing that living a good life depends partly on things outside our control, like luck and relationships, making goodness vulnerable and fragile.

Based on where you are in your exploration