Martha Nussbaum's reading in 'The Fragility of Goodness' argues Plato uses Alcibiades to indict attachment to particular persons, not to qualify the directional force of Erôs itself.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Alcibiades(a specific figure Plato uses in his writing): A character in Plato's dialogues—a beautiful and ambitious Athenian who serves as an example in philosophical arguments about desire, virtue, and attachment.
Erôs(a Greek philosophical concept about the nature of desire): A Greek word for a passionate, intense form of love or desire—different from friendship (philia); it often involves attraction and yearning.
Martha Nussbaum(as the main thinker referenced in the statement): A contemporary American philosopher known for writing about emotions, ethics, and how societies should be organized; she argues that certain emotions like anger can actually harm our justice systems.
Plato(the person whose decision to write is being analyzed in this example): An ancient Greek philosopher (around 428-348 BCE) who wrote famous dialogues exploring big questions about knowledge, justice, and reality.

Based on where you are in your exploration