Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Mathematical entities must be accepted as part of our phi... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Mathematical entities must be accepted as part of our philosophical ontology

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Mathematics is indispensable to our best scientific theories
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.It is not clear how scientific theories could be expressed without mathematical vocabulary
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A naturalistic stance requires accepting the ontological commitments of indispensable theories
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    A naturalistic stance requires accepting the ontological commitments of indispen...It is not clear how scientific theories could be expressed without mathematical ...Mathematics is indispensable to our best scientific theories

    Similar

    Every entity must belong to some ontological category.86%An acceptable ontology of literature must accept entities of a categor...83%Medieval philosophers accept a broadly Aristotelian ontology.82%Theoretical entities that make our philosophical theories significantl...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: philosophy-mathematics
    View source passageHide passage
    Putnam applied Quine’s naturalistic stance to mathematical ontology (Putnam 1972). At least since Galilei, our best theories from the natural sciences are mathematically expressed. Newton’s theory of gravitation, for instance, relies heavily on the classical theory of the real numbers. Thus an ontological commitment to mathematical entities seems inherent to our best scientific theories. This line of reasoning can be strengthened by appealing to the Quinean thesis of confirmational holism. Empir
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit