Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Matter and motion cannot produce thought and intelligence — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Connected to 2 discussions

    Challenges→Matter cannot be the final and original self-existing being
    Supports→The original self-existent being must be an intelligent, immaterial being

    Matter and motion cannot produce thought and intelligence

    CausationNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    In the order of causes and effects, the cause must always be more excellent than...Intelligence and thought exist in the world as effects requiring a causeMatter cannot be the final and original self-existing beingMotion and intelligence exist in the world and require explanation
    +5 moreShow less
    No effect can have any perfection that was not already in its causeNothing can come from nothingThe cause must always be more excellent than the effectThe original self-existent being must be an intelligent, immaterial beingTherefore the original cause must itself possess intelligence and immateriality

    Similar

    Finite minds are not the source of motion in bodies.83%Finite human minds are not the source of motion in bodies.82%Bodies do not possess motion essentially (motion is not intrinsic to b...78%Kepler explicitly rejects Aristotelian moving intelligences.77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: hume-religion
    View source passageHide passage
    Another argument that Clarke provides (not mentioned by Hume in the Dialogues) to show that it is impossible for matter to be “the final and original being” is that we cannot explain the origin of motion and intelligence in the world if matter is the first, original self-existing being. The basic principle that Clarke relies on to establish this conclusion is, once again, that “nothing can come from nothing”. In this case the principle is interpreted as implying that “in order of causes and effe

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective