Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Meaning is a function of the conventions of the language system at the time of reception, not the private psychological states of the author.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Conventions alone cannot explain metaphor, irony, or novel coinages that break rules yet successfully convey the speaker's specific intended meaning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A speaker can deliberately misuse conventions to mean something contrary to standard usage; audience grasps this because they infer mental intent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Meaning requires intentionality—conventions are tools speakers use to achieve communication, but the act of meaning-making originates in minds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The same sentence means different things across time periods, showing meaning depends on evolving conventions, not fixed authorial intent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Readers without access to an author's psychology can still grasp meaning through shared linguistic rules, proving psychology is unnecessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Authors often fail to express their intended meaning, yet readers successfully extract coherent meaning—suggesting convention, not intention, determines it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.