Medieval logicians including Buridan distinguished 'formal consequence' holding in virtue of logical form from consequences holding in virtue of the meanings of categorematic terms.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Buridan: # Buridan Jean Buridan was a medieval French philosopher (1300-1358) best known for the paradox "Buridan's Ass," which illustrates the problem of making choices when faced with equally attractive options. The paradox imagines a donkey standing between two identical piles of hay—unable to decide which to eat, it starves to death. This thought experiment explores how we make decisions when logic alone can't break a tie, and it remains relevant to modern discussions about free will and decision-making.
Medieval logicians(as a historical group being referenced): Philosophers from roughly the 5th to 15th centuries in Europe who specialized in studying the rules of reasoning and how language works.
categorematic terms(Medieval logic): The content-bearing terms of an argument that constitute its matter.
formal consequence(Ockham's theory of consequences): A consequence that holds in virtue of middles, either intrinsic or extrinsic

Based on where you are in your exploration