Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Medieval logicians like Burley held that a false positum is granted as-if true for the duration of the disputation, suspending not time but the constraint of actuality.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If a false positum is treated as true, the distinction between logical analysis and mere pretense becomes philosophically unclear and ad hoc.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Medieval logicians themselves struggled to articulate how actuality's constraint differs from time itself, suggesting conceptual confusion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Granting false premises as-if true risks validating sophistic reasoning by providing no principled limit on what may be temporarily accepted.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical analysis requires temporarily bracketing metaphysical constraints to examine argumentative structure without ontological interference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Medieval disputations aimed at training reasoning skills, which demands examining implications of hypothetical positions regardless of truth.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Suspending actuality while preserving logical time allows examination of counterfactuals without contradiction or temporal incoherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.