Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Meinong's distinction between Sein and Sosein entails tha... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The word 'exist' is not ambiguous despite having been claimed to be

    Meinong's distinction between Sein and Sosein entails that 'exist' applies only to a proper subset of objects, while 'subsist' or 'have being' covers abstract and impossible objects differently.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Abstract objects like numbers appear to have properties without existing in spacetime, suggesting 'subsist' correctly captures their ontological status.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Impossible objects like round squares have consistent internal properties (Sosein) despite lacking existence, requiring distinct ontological categories.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Restricting 'exist' to concrete objects avoids counterintuitive claims that fictional characters or mathematical sets literally exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The Sein/Sosein distinction duplicates work already done by modal logic and predication theory without clear explanatory advantage.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Allowing non-existent objects to have properties violates the logical principle that properties require bearers in some concrete sense.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.'Subsist' lacks clear criteria for individuation: how do we count or distinguish objects that don't exist in any standard sense?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Meinong(namesake of the distinction being discussed)
    An Austrian philosopher from the late 1800s who developed theories about objects that don't exist, like fictional characters or impossible things.
    Sein(German philosophical terminology used by Hegel)
    Being; the ontological status an item has when it is real.
    Sosein(contrasted with Sein in Meinong's theory)
    A German philosophical term meaning 'being-such' or 'how something is'—basically, all the qualities and characteristics an object has, regardless of whether it actually exists.
    abstract objects(The target of Platonist ontological claims)
    Objects referred to by singular terms in literally true sentences that cannot be paraphrased away; includes mathematical objects (e.g., numbers), propositions, properties, relations, sentence types, possible worlds, logical objects, and fictional objects.
    impossible objects(another type of thing that subsists rather than exists)
    Things that contradict the laws of logic or physics, like a square circle or a married bachelor—they can be thought about and described even though they cannot exist.
    subsist(what abstract and impossible objects do in Meinong's theory)
    A philosophical term meaning 'to have a kind of existence or reality' without necessarily existing in the physical world—used for abstract things like numbers or ideas.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    'Subsist' lacks clear criteria for individuation: how do we count or distinguish...Abstract objects like numbers appear to have properties without existing in spac...Allowing non-existent objects to have properties violates the logical principle ...Impossible objects like round squares have consistent internal properties (Sosei...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Restricting 'exist' to concrete objects avoids counterintuitive claims that fict...The Sein/Sosein distinction duplicates work already done by modal logic and pred...The word 'exist' is not ambiguous despite having been claimed to be