Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Memory is causally dependent on personal identity rather than constitutive of it, as Reid argued against Locke's circularity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Reid's appeal to an underlying 'substance' or 'soul' is metaphysically obscure and makes identity equally mysterious, not clearer.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Memory actually constitutes our practical and epistemic grasp of personal identity; without it, identity claims become empirically inaccessible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Infants lack robust autobiographical memory yet gain identity through time; this shows identity is memory-dependent, not merely causally related.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Personal identity must be logically independent of memory, else we cannot explain how we identify persons before they form memories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Locke's criterion creates circularity: X is the same person as Y if X remembers Y's experiences, but this presupposes X and Y are the same person.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Memory is a psychological state that causally depends on a continuing subject; the subject cannot depend on its own mental products.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.